« what’s not to love about a serial killer? | Back to Main Page | so you want to raise a daring girl? »

mikearringtonJust when you thought Mike Arrington couldn’t squeeze enough content out of PayPerPost - he surprises you! In today’s episode, Mike trolls the PayPerPost message boards and singles out especially “pathetic” (his words, not mine) users to put together a new blog entry about the Google pagerank shift.

In this amazing editorial (note: sarcasm), Mike links to specific discussions on the PayPerPost / Izea message boards where users talked about the recent pagerank updates that left many bloggers with a much lower pagerank than expected. Mike goes on to call the posts “pathetic”, and the users “freaked out”.

I completely agree with the freaked out portion - I imagine Mike would be in the same boat if Google ever came after him for the PR juice he gives to his sponsors. But pathetic? Since when it is it pathetic to wonder how you’re going to pay your bills? Is it pathetic to worry when an income source dries up? As much as I’d like to tell my fellow bloggers c’est la vie, don’t worry about it…I can’t. Too many people depending on their blogs for income DON’T have another source of income, or a full time job. Blogs have turned into a way for people to pay for a debt free Christmas, or an extra vacation, or braces for the child, or household extras. When did it become pathetic to wonder how you were going to make ends meet?

What IS pathetic is Mike. Trolling a message board for content proves it’s a slow news day, but posting it and calling people names proves you’re a heartless bastard. (I like how he ignored all of the POSITIVE comments on the thread by people saying they were going to work on content, keep blogging, and not be Google’s bitch!)

Mike has learned over the past few months that anytime PayPerPost is mentioned on his site, his pageviews go up and he gets tons of comments. He’s no fool - bashing the company has turned into big business for him, and going after the bloggers of PayPerPost by publishing their words on his site is just one more way to make a buck. What he fails to realize is that he’s ticking off his regular readers who made him what he is BEFORE he started using PayPerPost for content. The people who have been reading TechCrunch since the beginning are becoming increasing disenchanted with Mike. I know he’s crossed the line, and so do his regulars. The question is, is Mike smart enough to know when he’s crossed the line? Obviously not.

What a swell guy! What’s next - kicking kittens?

Digg this entry!

This entry was posted on Friday, November 30th, 2007 at 10:43 am and is filed under Bitchy-Poo, Geek Squad. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

18 Responses to “how low can he go?”

  1. On November 30th, 2007 at 10:51 am Xial had this to say...

    Well, he’s just par for the course, really.

    He’ll try to punt a lolkitten next, and get pwned by a lolrus.
    I stopped caring about him a while back, I guess.

  2. On November 30th, 2007 at 10:59 am Kim had this to say...

    When I read that post, I was so…mad that I couldn’t even comment. Hopefully this post will result in him losing readership. but I highly doubt it.

  3. On November 30th, 2007 at 11:01 am Loretta had this to say...

    Juts when you think someone can’t be more of an a$$ they go and surprise you.

  4. On November 30th, 2007 at 11:21 am Marisa had this to say...

    I’d have to say that Mike is polluting the blogosphere. Hmmm… where have I read that accusation? It sounds so familiar…

  5. On November 30th, 2007 at 11:30 am Holly had this to say...

    “What IS pathetic is Mike. Trolling a message board for content proves it’s a slow news day, but posting it and calling people names proves you’re a heartless bastard.”

    I love that you said this, I just posted a comment on his blog saying the same thing. Well the slow news day part. Not smart on his part to go after mom’s and children.

  6. On November 30th, 2007 at 11:37 am Lisa Marie Mary had this to say...

    Oh. my. gawd. What a complete jerk! That is so mean of him! I love the comment warning him to watch out for Karma!!

  7. On November 30th, 2007 at 12:05 pm D had this to say...

    Your Bitchy-poos are the best.

  8. On November 30th, 2007 at 12:30 pm Jules had this to say...

    Great post Colleen. You hit the nail on the head with this one!

  9. On November 30th, 2007 at 2:46 pm Karoli had this to say...

    Great post, dugg and stumbled. :) I also posted about this last night here. (And yes, I put a nofollow tag on that link. ;-))

  10. On November 30th, 2007 at 6:07 pm Elizabeth had this to say...

    I’m not embarrassed to admit that I am the blogger he called “pathetic”, that those were my forum posts he quoted. Yes, I was overly emotional that day, and yes, I came off sounding much more hysterical than I intended, but still. What if I were a physically handicapped single mother who needed to make money with blogging? Would he still call me pathetic?

    I’ve been debating about even posting something about this. I don’t want to invite further criticism, but I feel like I need to address it. Maybe in a few days when I’ve calmed down a bit. Anyway, thank you for posting this. Even if you didn’t know it was me he was referring to, I still feel the love :)

  11. On November 30th, 2007 at 7:36 pm Karoli had this to say...

    Elizabeth, I knew it was you he was talking about, even though I don’t know you. And that’s the thing — it’s really less about you personally than it is the idea of someone who makes *hundreds of thousands of dollars* per month on his blogs turning a bunch of venom on someone who is trying to make enough to cover the bills or get the kids presents or afford healthcare.

    The arrogance of the affluent is sickening, and for him to use YOU as linkbait just sucks.

  12. On November 30th, 2007 at 7:57 pm Cheryl had this to say...

    What an ass, and I went over there and told him so!

  13. On December 1st, 2007 at 1:50 am Jenn had this to say...

    I’d love to go over there adn give him a little bit of an asskicking, but it seems that Tech Crunch is down at the moment….I almost feel like crying happy tears tee hee hee! I think that Karma’s already coming around to bite him!

  14. On December 2nd, 2007 at 6:03 am Opal Tribble had this to say...

    It definitely sounds as though he were trying to get a rise out of people so for that he succeeded. Writing a paid review doesn’t make you a shill. I don’t see it any differently thank recognizing your sponsors. I don’t write a lot of sponsored reviews, but I know a few of my blog buddies that depend on them to pay their bills or get a few extras some of them also work outside the home.
    TechCrunch makes part of their money from Sponsors the only difference, I think, is they receive a lot more. Belittling someone whom you think is beneath you shows the level, or a lack of class, he has.
    I used to read Tech Crunch, but I stopped when they allowed this sort of behavior to go on.

  15. On December 2nd, 2007 at 11:04 am Tim had this to say...

    New googlebomb: So gay

  16. On December 2nd, 2007 at 11:13 pm Vienna had this to say...

    What kind of arsch would call posties “pathetic” when he himself earns indirecly from PPP? I know! The Worst Kind of Arsch!

    Since PPP is always able to counter his attacks and is able to show the bogosphere what an arsch he is.. he goes after the posties.

  17. On February 7th, 2008 at 10:37 pm The Mommy Blogger had this to say...

    This is a great post. Looks like your got your page rank back though - how did you do that?

  18. On February 18th, 2008 at 1:20 pm Robert had this to say...

    Looks like I’m a little late to the game in reading this post but you’re absolutesly right. I seem to remember him being called out last year for engaging in a bit of behind the scenes ‘positive’ posting for money. His comment was that he had a business to run and he was trying to pay the bills.

Please leave a comment.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>